![]() There is, for instance, something of a paradox connected with any attempt to localise it. He wrote in his original paper: "I do not wish to give the impression that I think there is no mystery about consciousness. ![]() Turing, for his part, anticipated this somewhat. The counter-argument to that is that humans could well just be following a large list of mechanical rules, and then you're deep into philosophy of consciousness and intentionality. As such, the Turing Test doesn't test whether a machine can genuinely think. A machine that can pass the Turing Test could just be following a large list of mechanical rules. A second issue is that simulated intelligence isn't the same thing as real intelligence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |